| ▲ | bjt 6 hours ago | |
Setting aside Flock, the "ownership" situation is not as clear as you say above. What you own is the image copyright. But the right to copy is only one of the rights at issue. Under various state laws (California in particular), you might not be entitled to do all the things with that picture that you could do of one that doesn't have my likeness. Privacy laws like the CCPA are one possible carve-out. A "right of publicity" is another. There's an old saying about property law that "property is a bundle of sticks". The bundle can be subdivided. | ||