Has anyone found a good code review workflow with `jj`? My problem is that GitHub doesn't remember the content of the last reviewed SHA, so every time I push a new change from jj, reviewers lose the delta from their last reviewed commit.

To work around this I stopped moving revs (squash/rebase) after review starts, which creates awkward local graphs if I have to merge from main for merge conflicts. Graphite works but it's $$$, and phabricator/reviewable/gerritt all have significant onboarding hurdles.

▲

roblabla 13 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I wonder if the recent github stack system could help with that (https://github.github.com/gh-stack/guides/ui/)

	▲	shuyang 13 hours ago \| parent [-]
		waitlist only :/ waiting to get in so i can test it out!

▲

nerdypepper 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

https://tangled.org does exactly what you want :)

have a longer write up here: https://blog.tangled.org/stacking but we have "interdiffs", to view a delta from previous review. pull-requests advance in the form of immutable rounds much like the patch workflow on email.

we have been interdiffing and stacking for a while on to dogfood, sample PR: https://tangled.org/tangled.org/core/pulls/1265/round/1?diff...

▲

joshka 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The last reviewed sha is generally available on the PR page (not the changes page) when you force push. There should be a changes since review link somewhere near the push.

When reviewing, you can also mark individual files as reviewed (useful in larger reviews where you're incrementally reviewing files). If you do this, only files that are changed will be expanded when you come back to the review.

	▲	shuyang 12 hours ago \| parent [-]
		yeah, this is where my complaint is - github shows a "compare" button when I force push, but it's not linked to the PR review. The "file changed" status is often not granular enough - if I change one line, force push, the entire file gets marked as unreviewed. the github "changes since your last review" is commit-based, not sha-based. what I want is something like graphite/gerritt/google's critique where after each force push, the review page shows only the true delta between the two shas (similar to the "compare" button in github, bu as a reviewable unit). poked around on github, doesn't look like the stacked PR feature has affected this "changes since your last review" selector yet :(

▲

saghm 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I haven't noticed any significant change in my workflow needed to accommodate this, but it might be because I've always used rebase rather than merge. `jj rebase -d main` will put my current branch on top of the main branch, and fixing conflicts in `jj` is a breath of fresh air compared to git.

▲

bananapub 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

github added support for this in the last six hours - https://github.github.com/gh-stack/faq/#will-this-work-with-...