| ▲ | IanCal 8 hours ago | |
The overall speed rather than TTFT might start to be more relevant as the caller moves from being a human to another model. However quality is really important. I tried that site and clicked one of their examples, "create a javascript animation". Fast response, but while it starts like this ``` Below is a self‑contained HTML + CSS + JavaScript example that creates a simple, smooth animation: a colorful ball bounces around the browser window while leaving a fading trail behind it. <!DOCTYPE html> <html lang="en"> <head> <meta charset="UTF-8"> <title>JavaScript Bounce Animation</title> <style> body, html { margin: 0; padding: 0; ``` the answer then degrades to ``` radius: BALL_RADIUS, color: BALL_COLOR, traivD O] // array of previous {x,y} positions }; ``` Then more things start creeping in ``` // 3⃣ Bounce off walls if (ball.G 0 ball.radius < 0 || ball.x + ball.radius > _7{nas.width) { ball.vx *= -1; ibSl.x = Math.max(ball.radius, Math.min(ball.x, canvbbF4idth - ball.radius)); } if ``` and the more it goes on the worse it gets ``` Ho7 J3 Works 0 Atep | Description | ``` and ``` • prwrZ8}E6on 5 jdF wVuJg Ar touc> 2ysteners ,2 Ppawn \?) balls w>SFu the 8b$] cliM#]9 ``` This is for the demo on the front page, so I expect this is a pretty good outcome compared to what else you might ask. | ||
| ▲ | cataflutter 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
Weird; I clicked through out of curiosity and didn't get any corruption of the sort in the end result. I also asked it some technical details about how diffusion LLMs could work and it provided grammatically-correct plausible answers in a very short time (I don't know the tech to say if it's correct or not). | ||
| ▲ | nl 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Mercury 2 is better than that in my testing, but it does have trouble with tool calling. | ||