In what way did you find the headline misleading from the actual content of the article?

Here's an editorialized title in the other direction: On Roblox everyone can make games and play them with their friends.

Here's my suggestion for an amendement:

"Roblox devs will need plus membership to publish to young users"

	▲	alt227 8 hours ago \| parent [-]
		But the term 'Roblox Devs' can also include other children. You seem to be missing the point a bit that kids used to be able to make games and share them with their friends for free. Now they need a paid subscription and a face scan to do that. Yes it makes sense when you apply it to adults, but Roblox was made for kids to share and play with other kids. When you look at it from that angle it makes no sense.