I think this has been imprinted in the photographer world due to long-standing requirements from AP, Reuters, etc. on avoiding post-processing. Video has never had these constraints; post-processing is required to publish the works.

▲

tablatom 9 hours ago | parent [-]

That’s interesting - how do they define that? Surely they don’t publish raw rgb?

	▲	discopicante 7 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Reuters banned photos processed from RAW over 10y ago. They will only accept JPEGs from the camera. https://signalprocessingsociety.org/community-involvement/in... AP has had these rules since the late 90s: "Only the established norms of standard photo printing methods such as burning, dodging, black-and-white toning and cropping are acceptable. Retouching is limited to removal of normal scratches and dust spots." https://niemanreports.org/aps-policy-banning-photo-manipulat...
	▲	bombcar 4 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		As mentioned it's impossible to get "unretouched digital photos" because the camera itself does post-processing - but there were some spicy scandals that arguably were somewhere in the gray area between "move a damn pyramid" and "applying normal lighting techniques" that they resolved with "just use JPEG from the camera". Of course, we now know that "JPEG from the camera" can be complete bollocks, so it's going to get worse. https://www.bronxdoc.org/bronx-documentary-center/exhibits/a... https://old.reddit.com/r/Android/comments/11nzrb0/samsung_sp...