Now we just need a proper replacement for After Effects on Linux and I will stop dualbooting.

Fusion has great potential, but is probably being held back by a lack of community support, the slightly-higher-barrier-of-entry of node-based workflows, and the subtle but annoying ways in which the software can work against you.

TLDR: it does some stuff slower than ae, but nodes allows it to very easily do a lot of stuff that ae struggles with.

It's also a lot easier to parse since node->properties is less nested than comp->layers->effects->properties (and this makes a big difference on cognitive load).

▲

4k93n2 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

is davinci fusion not an after effects alternative? or is it not at the same level?

	▲	whywhywhywhy 7 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		There’s crossover in that they both do compositing but AE uniquely has a lot of other things from the motion graphics side that just doesn’t exist anywhere else.
	▲	alfirous 7 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		In my experience, it's not easy as After Effects. Though for simple VFX, motion or animation is doable. For me best alternative to AE is Blender.
	▲	8 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		[deleted]