Did you use the web back in 1995? It was fun, but it also sucked compared to what we have now. Nothing is ever perfect, but I wouldn’t want to go back.

▲

ryandrake 12 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I’d go back in a heartbeat. Making the web a software SDK was the worst thing to happen to it.

▲

arjie 11 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Gemini websites are pretty much the old web: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gemini_(protocol)

Both in terms of comprehensiveness and in terms of functionality.

	▲	jl6 10 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Geminispace is a very chill place. It’s definitely not a replacement for the web, but if you can handle the compromises, it feels like both the past and the future.

▲

socalgal2 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

So, apparently you don't use google maps (or any other mapping website)

	▲	phkahler 3 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		That could be a web app.
	▲	krater23 7 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		The data that google maps is caching in my browser is more than Google World needed disc space back then. So why not just use Google World for that?

▲

skydhash 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I read epubs, and html pages derived from texinfo and mandoc. When I see websites that just break down when you disable JS (I do it with ublock), I always feel a pang of sadness. Unless you’re Figma, Google doc, or OpenStreetMap…, which rely heavily on local state, JS should only be required for small island of interaction.

▲

collabs 12 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

You talk about 1995 but I wouldn't even go back to 1999. Dialup was so painful. It advertised 56 know but in practice I never even say 48...

	▲	yjftsjthsd-h 12 hours ago \| parent [-]
		That seems like a separate thing. You can send 199x-era HTML over a gigabit connection.

▲

hnlmorg 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I wrote web pages in 1995. There was actually plenty you could do, but it was all server side driven.

And the ironic thing is you are chatting on a forum that could have easily been built in 1995.

▲

bonesss 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I published my first website in 1995 (and while it wasn’t even a little popular, eventually a spammy gay porn site popped up with the exact same joke name, leading to a pretty odd early “what if you search for your own site” experience).

If you put 2026 media players (with modern bandwidth), on the manually curated small-editorial web of ‘95 it’d be amazing.

We used to have desktop apps, these SPA JS monstrosities are the result of MS missing the web then MS missing mobile. Instead of a desktop monopoly where ActiveX could pop up (providing better app experiences in many cases than one would think), we have cross-platform electron monstrosities and fat react apps that suck, are slow, and omfgbbq do they break. And suck. And eat up resources. Copy and paste breaks, scrolling breaks, nav gets hijacked, dark mode overridden.

Netflix, Spotify, MS have apps I see breaking on the regular on prime mainstream hardware. My modern gaming windows laptop, extra juicy GPU for all the LLM and local kubernetes admin, chokes on windows rendering. Windows isn’t just regressing, their entire stack is actively rotting, and all behind fancy web buttons.

Old man yelling at cloud, but: geeeez boys, I want to go back.

▲

robotswantdata 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I’d go back. The BBS and dial up days look cosy

Now it’s owned by corporates and everyone is using bloated JS frameworks.

	▲	roygbiv2 9 hours ago \| parent [-]
		There are still BBS you can access via telnet (and actual dial up if you really want), after the fifth one asks you for your full name, street address and phone Humber it gets a little old.

▲

peterspath 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I would also go back in a heartbeat

▲

wmf 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You're not wrong but we've never really tried the combination of modern CSS with no JS. It could produce elegant designs that load really fast... or ad-filled slop but declarative.

▲

dylan604 32 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Yes to the modern CSS. To go as far back as suggested would mean using frames again and table based layouts with 1x1 invisible gifs to use for spacing layouts. Never again!

▲

chongli 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Ads don’t work nearly as well without JavaScript for adtech. They’re basically limited to static banners and text ads as well as sponsorships.

	▲	dylan604 33 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Sounds glorious

▲

themafia 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> Did you use the web back in 1995?

I'm still not over the loss of Gopher.