| ▲ | linkregister 4 days ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Internet universities have been available for several decades; correspondence degrees for almost a century. Sure, credentialing is a large part of students' choices to attend in-person. Yet the primary reason students attend universities in person is because most people learn best in-person, with personal interaction. I would not be confident in underemployment figures for 2025 published this early in the year. The New York Federal Reserve has published underemployment rates from 2024 only a couple months ago [1]. In it, computer science underemployment is lower than other majors, even in the mathematical and natural sciences. Aggregated new graduate underemployment has been higher in previous decades than the current level. Underemployment is the right metric to consider because it captures people who accepted lower-skill jobs in order to support themselves. 1. https://www.newyorkfed.org/research/college-labor-market#--:... | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | dylan604 4 days ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> Yet the primary reason students attend universities in person is the parties, the co-eds, and the start of life from outside the direct supervision of parental units. Let's be honest, all of this education stuff is secondary to that. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||