I dont think that will ever be possible.

At some point security becomes - the program does the thing the human wanted it to do but didn't realize they didn't actually want.

No amount of testing can fix logic bugs due to bad specification.

▲

skrtskrt 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

AI as advanced fuzz-testing is ridiculously helpful though - hardly any bug you can in this sort of advanced system is a specification logic bug. It's low-level security-based stuff, finding ways to DDOS a local process, or work around OS-level security restrictions, etc.

▲

bawolff 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

I'm kind of doubtful that AI is all that great at fuzz testing. Putting that aside though, we are talking about web browsers here. Security issues from bad specification or misunderstanding the specification is relatively common.

▲

thephyber 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Re-read the thread you are replying to.

Each of the last 4 comments in your thread (including yours) are conflating what they mean by AI.

	▲	skrtskrt 21 hours ago \| parent [-]
		You must be lost.

▲

falcor84 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Well, yes, agreed - that is the essential domain complexity.

But my argument is that we can work to minimize the time we spend on verifying the code-level accidental complexity.

	▲	bawolff 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		Sure, but that is what we've been doing since the early 2000s (e.g. aslr, read only stacks, static analysis, etc). And we've had some succeses, but i wouldn't expect any game changing breakthroughs any time soon.