| ▲ | adrianN 4 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
How good are LLMs at geoguessing? | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | jcalx 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Quite good, per Bellingcat [0] — Google Lens and ChatGPT could localize the majority of their test photos pretty specifically. [0] https://www.bellingcat.com/resources/2025/08/14/llms-vs-geol... | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | jillesvangurp 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Pretty good. I played a bit with gpt-4 a year or so ago by feeding it random screenshots from Google street view. It will pick up a lot of subtle hints from what otherwise looks like generic streets. I imagine more recent models might be better at this now. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | firtoz 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Pretty good. I test it every now and then from random photos. Sometimes spot on, sometimes gets very close, unless it's really ambiguous. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | embedding-shape 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Basically all up to the training data, as things often are. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||