We built the frontend for https://brooked.io and https://app.brooked.io using only prompting so I agree!

▲ iamcalledrob 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

You could argue that what you built isn't novel or complex in any way -- (politely) it's basically a clone of hundreds of other SAAS homepages. i.e. its a perfect use-case for AI.

Perhaps the results would be different if you had a specific novel design or interaction in mind, and you wanted the AI to implement that exactly as you wanted.

edit: My point proven by the other examples from this thread. Same format, same "feature cards" etc. https://bridge.ritza.co/ https://poolometer.com/

	▲	mindfulmark 3 days ago \| parent [-]
		I think it’s ok that it’s similar to other SaaS websites. It wouldn’t exist if it weren’t for LLMs and it gets the job done and looks decent.

▲ basilikum 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It shows.

The landing page looks like every other AI slopped product page out there.

▲

adastra22 3 days ago | parent [-]

It’s funny how there are a bunch of responses to this post all showing off their great AI designs that are literally the same thing with different (each horrible) color palettes.

	▲	basilikum 3 days ago \| parent [-]
		It's really weird. I don't even care if they used AI as part of their development process. But most AI™ developed stuff is just so insanely soulless crap I can instantly can tell and instinctively close the tab. If you're AI developed software was so great, I couldn't tell it's AI. Like I cannot wrap my head around how anyone vibe slops and think "No, this is good. I will now proudly show this off."

▲ dotancohen 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

  > Your data,
  > irectl in you
  > spreadsheets

I'm guessing the third word is "directly“? The D is cut off. And the grammar is wrong, should be "in your spreadsheets" - maybe that is another letter cut off?

Go back to human devs.