While not obvious from the article, it appears that they want something S3 like, but isn’t from Amazon, and possibly want to self host it. The article could be much more clear about the goals

▲

larrymcp 9 hours ago | parent [-]

Ah, thanks. Yeah I was confused because in his long list of vendors he didn't mention Wasabi, Backblaze etc. It appears that I do not know the context of his post.

▲

cdrnsf 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I’ve never had an issue with Backblaze. I mirror my buckets to iDrive who, so far, have also been perfectly fine.

▲

sudb 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

or cloudflare R2 for that matter (very useful for egress-heavy workloads for which it is ~free)

	▲	jppope 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I was curious why this didn't come up in the article

▲

ovaistariq 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

or Tigris