> But the framing here is not “clever, innovative IRGC”

I am not seeking to frame anything here. Nor am I interested in getting involved in the broader areas on discussion on the subject.

The first few words of my original post made it clear "Looking at it from an alternative angle". An alternative way of wording that would be "devil's advocate".

I am just supplying a perfectly reasonable alternative perspective, I am not asking anyone to agree or disagree with it, I am just making a "food for thought" statement.

▲

jncfhnb 7 hours ago | parent [-]

I don’t see any alternative angle though. Nobody thinks the IRGC is doing this for fun.

▲

overfeed 4 hours ago | parent [-]

> I don’t see any alternative angle though

I see it, and hadn't fully considered it. Turning off the Internet has more utility than just suppressing the populaces ability to communicate, it also blackholes that compromised mail server used to track the movement of political leaders, any online drop-boxes/Telegram/Whatsapp channels used by cultivated informants/spies are now out of order.

▲

ElectricalUnion 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

From my point of view, they can't even "just turn on the Internet", even if they wanted.

We know from the Ukraine side that "keeping the internet on" requires a whole bunch of personal sacrifice, and a lot of "reasonably recent" electronic equipment and infrastructure that Iran can't simply buy or repair right now.

	▲	overfeed an hour ago \| parent [-]
		I'll bet you - dollars to donuts - that Iran has many countrywide IP-based networks running at this second, for things such as broadcast and telecoms. Perhaps you are underestimating the resources available to a country of 90 million. You could play a game where you estimate the number of routers and switches outside of Tehran under a hypothetical where the the capital was leveled. I don't know how many universities Iran has, but my working assumption is that any one Computer Science department from a D-Tier university is equal to the task, if the physical carrier medium for the Internet is still present and they are bringing their ancient half-rack of equipment.

▲

jncfhnb 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Ehhh I suppose but I think that’s a weak point. The purpose of shutting down the internet is undeniably to prevent the people from coordinating rebellion and the help control the narrative of the war.