| ▲ | compounding_it 10 hours ago | |
Given how much revenue depends on the experience of a web app and loading times, I’d be happy to pay 100$ a month on that revenue if I don’t have to sacrifice a second of additional loading time no matter how clever I was optimizing it. | ||
| ▲ | kijin 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
That 1 second of loading time probably has more to do with heavy frontends and third-party scripts, than the backend server's capacity. $100 is peanuts to most businesses, of course. But even so, I'd rather spend it on fixing an actual bottleneck. | ||
| ▲ | r0fl 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Not all businesses depend on milliseconds being shaved off the loading times For example: Ticketmaster makes a ton of money and their site is complete dogshit. | ||