I would switch to Codex, but Altman is such a naked sociopath and OpenAI so devoid of ethical business practices that I can't in good conscience. I'm not under any illusion that Anthropic is ethical, but it is so far a step up from OpenAI.

▲

groundzeros2015 9 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Enemy centered decision making

▲

nh2 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Cannot you use Codex (which is open source, unlike Claude Code) with Claude, even via Amazon Bedrock?

	▲	embedding-shape 7 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Codex with Anthrophic's models is not as good as using the models with the harness it was trained in mine for. Same goes vice-versa too.

▲

bob1029 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I'm with you on the ethical part, but everything is a spectrum. All the AI leadership are some shade of evil. There's no way the product would be effective if they weren't. I don't like that Sam Altman is a lunatic, but frankly they all are. I also recognize that these are massive companies filled with non shitty engineers who are actually responsible for a lot of the magic. Conflating one charlatan with the rest of it is a tragedy of nuance.

	▲	subscribed 10 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Yeah, but there's distinct difference between "risks their company because they refuse to help with killing little kids" and "happily helping with genocide". One of these is better.

▲

simianwords 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]

	▲	emaro 12 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		There's not one thing that stands out, but he abandoned the entire core principles of OpenAI (took a 180), constantly lies to people and doesn't plan to stop. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2026/04/13/sam-altman-may...
	▲	DonHopkins 12 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Calling out sociopaths is not virtue signaling. You need to look in the mirror if you think there's something wrong with that kind of virtue. You know, you can just google his name yourself, don't you?