> It is relevant because you seem very young.

Well you're wrong. Again.

When your theories are consistently wrong, it's time to pause and reflect.

> I'm not young and I've seen processes as they happen.

You're wrong, but you've got your opinions though. Which you are sure are better than mine. The guy whose ancestors literally founded this country.

Please, Mr. Frenchman, tell me more about my own country.

> Eyes and ears are not good enough.

Wrong. They are the foundation of knowledge.

> You might be seeing some local effects that are biasing your opinion.

Wrong.

> I'm interested in your political views because they seem extremely left.

Wrong.

> Your political views are relevant because they shape your perception of reality and they also tell us what narratives you've exposed to.

Wrong. Not a word I can utter regarding my "political views" would help you in any way.

You're nowhere near the level of understanding necessary to have an intelligent conversation on this subject. Worse, you arrogantly believe that your knowledge is better than mine.

Read the essay I took the time to recommend. Read the book I recommended. When you are ready to learn more, then we may have a conversation. Until then, you have nothing to add to this thread that is of any value to anyone.

I'm not French. I guess we're both arrogant.

"America's Secret Establishment" I have not heard of. I'll put it on my reading list.