| ▲ | danslo 6 hours ago |
| If only the blog itself wasn't written by AI? >No reasoning. No capability. Just exploitation of how the score is computed. shudder |
|
| ▲ | cpldcpu 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Yes, marks of AI all over the place. Also the SVGs. >No solution written, 100% score. Its weird. Turns out that hardest problem for LLMs to really tackle is long-form text. |
| |
| ▲ | basch 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Maybe in one shot. In theory I would expect them to be able to ingest the corpus of the new yorker and turn it into a template with sub-templates, and then be able to rehydrate those templates. The harder part seems to be synthesizing new connection from two adjacent ideas. They like to take x and y and create x+y instead of x+y+z. | |
| ▲ | sidpatil 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Someone here mentioned a whole ago that the labs deliberately haven't tried to train these characteristics out of their models, because leaving them in makes it easier to identify, and therefore exclude, LLM-generated text from their training corpus. | | |
| ▲ | blymphony 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | But it's odd that these characteristics are the same across models from different labs. I find it hard to believe that researchers across competing companies are coordinating on something like that. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | alexchantavy 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I wonder what college freshman-level writing classes are teaching about writing voice and AI. The tell-tale patterns are pretty frustrating to read. |
| |
| ▲ | stefan_ 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Whatever classes these guys took, they skipped the one on scientific misconduct. |
|
|
| ▲ | wxw an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Agreed. The premise is interesting but reading content like this is grating. |
|
| ▲ | gaythread 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| [flagged] |
