| ▲ | The Center Has a Bias(lucumr.pocoo.org) | |||||||
| 14 points by yomismoaqui 2 days ago | 5 comments | ||||||||
| ▲ | kwbr3000 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
I am not following the authors argument. This logic accidentally gate-keeps opinions of people with ethical objections, people who can't afford the time and money to use it and even people for whom the tool is inaccessible. Any objection "This tool is built on stolen data" doesn't change based on whether I have used the tool for 50 hours or not. By defining a "center" only through the lens of usage we don't find objectivity. This sounds like rationalising survivorship bias for those who are able to pay and participate. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | khelavastr 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
That's how the center ends up bigoted against people who need more-complicated-to-understand accessibility. It's pernicious. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | benj111 a day ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Everyone's biased. If you don't think you're biased you just haven't identified the bias yet. For example 'the center' You are already talking about a subset of (probably English speaking) programmers let alone the population at large. So that's a bias there. And you've chosen the centre, other people may not agree with where you've put the centre. I for example am accused of being right wing and left wing. Presumably the accusers didn't think I was in the centre. Having said all this, I do agree with your points, I don't think you'll have much luck actually improving the level of conversation though. | ||||||||