I think it's good for CEOs of powerful companies to make statements about how they don't want too much personal power and it's important to ensure everyone does well, even and perhaps especially if there's reason to suspect they don't believe it. Saying it doesn't solve the problem, but it helps create a permission structure for the rest of us to get it to actually happen.

▲

tyre 3 hours ago | parent [-]

The reason he's saying that is because he doesn't want you to create that structure. He wants you to not create the laws or checks & balances on him because you "trust that he doesn't really want the power".

It has worked for him, repeatedly.

▲

SpicyLemonZest 3 hours ago | parent [-]

No, I don't think that's accurate. Altman has repeatedly and loudly demanded for these to be created, including a new detailed policy proposal just this month (https://cdn.openai.com/pdf/561e7512-253e-424b-9734-ef4098440...).

	▲	tyre 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		OpenAI has also repeatedly and quietly lobbied against them. You linked a vague PDF whose promised actions are: > To help sustain momentum, OpenAI is: (1) welcoming and organizing feedback through newindustrialpolicy@openai.com; (2) establishing a pilot program of fellowships and focused research grants of up to $100,000 and up to $1 million in API credits for work that builds on these and related policy ideas; and (3) convening discussions at our new OpenAI Workshop opening in May in Washington, DC. Welcoming and organizing feedback! A pilot! Convening discussions! This "commitment" pales in comparison to the money they've spent lobbying against specific regulation that cedes power. Please don't fall for this stuff.