new | show | ask | jobs Github

NickC25 4 hours ago

This.

Sam's got 3 billion net worth.

Jensen's got 165 billion to his name.

They are giddy about taking jobs away, and both are engaged in "tax reduction strategies" and suck up to Donald Trump.

You wonder why people are pissed?

▲

bloody-crow 3 hours ago | parent [-]

> They are giddy about taking jobs away

This is just your interpretation. My interpretation is that they talk about computers being able to perform some intellectual tasks that are now handled by humans in a more efficient and fast manner. They're excited about technological progress and new opportunities it provides, not being "giddy" about unemployment and economic uncertainty.

> suck up to Donald Trump

When you're a head of multi-billion dollar company that employ thousands of people and respond to board that expects your company to continue growing and make money for them, it's strategically dumb and irresponsible to NOT suck up to the most childish and vindictive person who has real power to screw over you and all the people you employ who expect you do everything in your power to prevent this.

If you don't do that and Trump fucks your company over as a result, you're just bad at your job as a CEO.

▲

tokioyoyo 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Where is everyone getting their information from in this thread? It’s like everyone is talking past each other.

I think AI is net-good. But every frontier lab founder has said, paraphrasing, “Things might go horribly wrong, a lot of people might lose jobs, or maybe we’ll have even better economy, and people will prosper. We can’t operate based on the former, because if our adversaries out-invent us, we’re screwed.”. Like all AI-adjacent companies talk about long-term savings, increasing productivity, needing less people to do the same jobs and etc. Obviously fully employed people, especially the ones with things to lose don’t want it?

Also, this is not a uniquely American thing. People in China are going through the same stuff.

▲

bloody-crow an hour ago | parent [-]

Ok, but it still seems to me that the messaging you're describing is pretty far from the original commenter's claim of them being "giddy about taking jobs away".

	▲	tokioyoyo 19 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Honestly, not that much different? They’re passionately selling the product with marketing that it will reduce your headcount. “Giddy about taking jobs away” is pretty apt. But again, I still believe AI is net good. Just horribly advertised to the general populace. There’s also no appetite in preparation for potential “worst case scenario”, so it makes everything sound bad to a commoner.