| ▲ | shevy-java 6 hours ago | |
But why should AI then be attributed if it is merely a tool that is used? | ||
| ▲ | lonelyasacloud 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
Having an honesty based tag could be only way to monitor impact or get after a fix in code bases if things go south. That is at the moment: - Nobody knows for sure what agents might add and their long term effects on codebases. - It's at best unclear that AI content in a codebase can be reliably determined automatically. - Even if it's not malicious, at least some of its contributions are likely to be deleterious and pass undetected by human review. | ||
| ▲ | hgoel an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
This is a good point but I'd take it in the opposite direction from the implication, we should document which tools were used in general, it'd be a neat indicator of what people use. | ||
| ▲ | plmpsu 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
it makes sense to keep track of what model wrote what code to look for patterns, behaviors, etc. | ||
| ▲ | streetfighter64 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
It isn't? > AI agents MUST NOT add Signed-off-by tags. Only humans can legally certify the Developer Certificate of Origin (DCO). They mention an Assisted-by tag, but that also contains stuff like "clang-tidy". Surely you're not interpreting that as people "attributing" the work to the linter? | ||