| ▲ | pixel_popping 7 hours ago |
| I don't think this is possible yet, because many people refuse to think AI would be eventually better than us at practically anything (at least anything virtual), they keep talking about what's "current" while I think it's completely irrelevant for that discussion, people need to assume extreme intelligence and orchestration tools (and robots) will be there, worldwide, it's a *fact*, not just a maybe. |
|
| ▲ | toraway 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| It is actually entirely possible to discuss a solution for something that may or may not happen. If a hurricane is approaching, we don't typically require every person to agree the odds of landfall are 100% to start preparing shelters and stockpiling aid nearby. Not everything in the world is about the "AI skeptics" on the internet being dumb and wrong unlike you. |
|
| ▲ | 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [deleted] |
|
| ▲ | classified 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Your "fact" is pure vaporware and hallucination. |
| |
| ▲ | pixel_popping 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | Let's talk about it again in 5 years, but 1-2 years from now, at the very least, coding will be over in the sense that the best models will do it better than the best (or the 99.99%). I don't think I'm hallucinating no, when my own work went from coding+managing+bunch of other stuff to just orchestrating and my output is just insanely higher and I literally have a bunch of friends that went from coding 8h a day to just "pretending to code" and just using a bunch of agents and get paid the same salary for working 30min a day, that's real, not an hallucination. | | |
| ▲ | shash 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | How are you/they instructing those agents? If you are writing detailed spec.md and reviewing those results, you are _still_ programming. Just in pseudocode effectively. I’ve seen enough session transcripts and detailed prompts that would have been easier to just write the code instead! | |
| ▲ | classified 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > in 5 years That's literally the same argument that the blockchain gurus made, and each following year it was still 5 years in the future. I'm getting strong Real Soon Now™ vibes. | | |
| ▲ | AlexCoventry 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | No, AI has real, immediate, large-scale industrial and scientific applications. Cryptocurrency is a massive disappointment, but AI has genuine potential value. | |
| ▲ | cleversomething 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Bitcoin was never actually valuable for the average person except if they got lucky by timing the speculation bubbles right, or if they were buying illegal drugs online. Lots of AI tools already add actual value and they're only getting better. Every software dev I know uses Claude at some level. Whether it will be the next trillion dollar unicorn might be overhype, but in terms of demonstrating its general utility, it's already there. No need to wait 5 years. | | |
| ▲ | pixel_popping 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It's really 2 very different things, only the "shilling" might be deja-vu. | |
| ▲ | sleepybrett 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > Every software dev I know uses Claude at some level. here is my leve:, try to get claude to properly perform some boring boilerplate for me until the tokens run out or i get super angry and then do it myself in a rage. | | |
| |
| ▲ | pixel_popping 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | common, that's very different, that's something current with practical use-cases that are already being implemented across all companies, I don't even know why we compare this with blockchain, blockchain is just some fancy resilient DB with proofs in the end. | |
| ▲ | sleepybrett 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | or elson and fsd. |
|
|
|
