A lot of the Ukrainian drones are produced in small buildings like homes and buisness, not massive centralized factories.

Hard to take out your enemy's production capability if A) you can't find it and B) it's highly distributed.

▲

carlosjobim 7 hours ago | parent [-]

They're assembled in small buildings, but at least some of the components require sophisticated factories. There are with all certainty weapons in orbit right now, locked on to these crucial factories, ready to fire if needed.

▲

Legend2440 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

In orbit? Probably not. No country has operational satellites designed to attack ground targets. They would need to launch missiles or send drones.

In a total war you absolutely do target factories and industry. But this is easier said than done; they tend to be deep inside enemy territory. And drones are made out of commonplace consumer electronics parts, which could be made in thousands of factories around the world.

▲

carlosjobim 7 hours ago | parent [-]

> No country has operational satellites designed to attack ground targets.

Why are you so sure of that? It would be very surprising if at least the United States and Russia didn't have orbital weapons. They've been in sending large stuff to space for decades.

Of course they wouldn't have told you or anybody else who isn't supposed to know.

> In a total war you absolutely do target factories and industry.

And that's what you would do - or threaten to do - long before you start replacing your roads with tunnels as the author is suggesting.

	▲	krisoft 6 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		> It would be very surprising if at least the United States and Russia didn't have orbital weapons. They've been in sending large stuff to space for decades. Depends on what you mean by “orbital weapons”. I assume you are not thinking of the sidearms of astronauts, or anti-satelite satelites. If you are thinking about nukes pre-positioned in space then the 1967 Outer Space Treaty bans the stationing of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) in outer space. And this is not just paper prohibition. The reality of space based nukes is that the time between deorbiting and touch-down is so short that nuclear armed states would treat their launch (the time when they are placed into orbit) as an attack and launch in retaliation against the launching country. Basically if you try to sneak them into orbit and the enemy finds out about them you will be anihilated. This is just simple MAD doctrine. So the strategic balance which is preventing you from launching your ground based warheads is the same which is preventing you from launching your future space based warheads into orbit. > Of course they wouldn't have told you or anybody else who isn't supposed to know. I wouldn’t assume that you or me would learn about it. But it is almost given that the peer nations would figure it out. They spend considerable resources trying to figure out if you are doing this. And then they get MAD and your country is no more.
	▲	psychoslave 6 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		No idea how actually efficient that would be even in theory. I guess it's not technical technicaly impossible, but would it really bring any benefit compared to launching possibly many more cheaper transcontinental rockets from earth were maintenance and control is definitely easier.

▲

gpm 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

The sophisticated factories they need are basically just for chips. And the problem with chips is that civilian life is just as dependent on them as military armaments.

The rest of the drone is all stuff that can be fabricated in small batches in a garage... of course bigs factories are more efficient at fabricating just about anything so to the extent that's possible it's done, but bombing all the big factories won't stop it.