| ▲ | buran77 3 hours ago | |
A summary can't be a matter of copyright. It's probably just the vehicle HBO chose to be able to identify the leaker, because claiming copyright infringement these days is like a superpower, and then use different hammer to go after them. | ||
| ▲ | mlyle 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
This is a legally tricky minefield. Depending on what is in summary, it -may- be subject to copyright but be protected as fair use... but a work being unpublished weighs against (but does not preclude) free use. I could see an argument that it is a trade secret, too-- which could be used to oppose downstream dissemination. | ||
| ▲ | ajcp 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
That too makes sense. | ||