| ▲ | Majromax 2 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
> Not a lawyer, but as I understand it the license is a matter of copyright, and the copyright only applies to the design files. So as long as you're making that keyboard for yourself then you should be good to do anything you want with the keyboard, because it is no longer using the license at that point. What if I take the design, print it, include the thing in a staged photo, and sell prints of the photo? What if I skip the printing and use the design files as a basis for a rendered photo or animation? What if I print the design, then use a 3D scanner to recreate a file from the physical artifact? | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | post-it 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
You're asking some pretty niche copyright questions that even a lawyer would have to spend time searching for case law for. It may be more expedient to look for that case law yourself. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | robinsonb5 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Not a lawyer either, but: > What if I take the design, print it, include the thing in a staged photo, and sell prints of the photo? Probably fair use, provided the design wasn't the main focus of the photo, but merely part of the "set dressing." > What if I skip the printing and use the design files as a basis for a rendered photo or animation? > What if I print the design, then use a 3D scanner to recreate a file from the physical artifact? Those questions are simpler - both scenarios would be derivative works of the original files, so covered by the license. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | vablings an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
> What if I take the design, print it, include the thing in a staged photo, and sell prints of the photo? This is probably acceptable > What if I skip the printing and use the design files as a basis for a rendered photo or animation? This is probably NOT acceptable > What if I print the design, then use a 3D scanner to recreate a file from the physical artifact? If you used that for personal things yes that would be acceptable. I do not think that would give you the right to then sell that as a product neither digitally nor phsically | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | galaxyLogic 39 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
What if I'm a sculptor and I design and produce a statue? Shouldn't I still have the copyright to the statue, no matter what kind of machine I used to do the actual sculpting? | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | dec0dedab0de 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
What if I print the design, then use a 3D scanner to recreate a file from the physical artifact? Hmm, without patents it would definitely be fine to scan an existing one and recreate it. I think this would be fine too, but any time you are clearly going out of your way to skirt the law is a red flag. The thing is, I don't even think technical designs are copyrightable outside of their aesthetic value. What if I take the design, print it, include the thing in a staged photo, and sell prints of the photo? What if I skip the printing and use the design files as a basis for a rendered photo or animation? If it is indeed covered by copyright, then these would likely be violations, though I guess it depends on how prominent it is in the staged photo. ...this stuff is fun to think about. | |||||||||||||||||