| ▲ | azalemeth 4 hours ago | |
For context, the (now accepted) amendment ensures that "anyone found to posses or publish pornography which shows incest between family members, or sex between step- or foster-relations where one person is pretending to be under-18, will be criminalised, with publication carrying a maximum penalty of two to five years’ imprisonment, depending on the severity of the content." This coming from a secondary legislature with an average age of 70. I do not think this a liberal move, to put it mildly. | ||
| ▲ | 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
| [deleted] | ||
| ▲ | amarant 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
First they came for the porn, and I said nothing, for I am not sexy enough to produce it. Then they came for cryptography, and I kept my peace, for I don't understand the mathematics involved. Then they came for my browsing history, and I could not hide the porn in there, as cryptography was illegal. Well fuck... | ||