Looks like the marketing worked at least somewhat lol. Such an obvious playbook by now I’m surprised some people here fell for it.

▲

skybrian 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Your cynicism doesn't prove that it's fake, though.

▲

davebren an hour ago | parent | next [-]

You've got to admit that crying wolf about how dangerous their new model is for the hundredth time right when the biggest story about the company was a leak that made them and their internal vibe-coding look totally incompetent is a bit suspect.

▲

skybrian an hour ago | parent [-]

Your cynicism doesn't prove that it's fake, though.

	▲	davebren 15 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		You got the causality backwards, the cynicism is because it's most likely to be fake.

▲

nothinkjustai 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Just like their marketing campaign doesn’t mean those claims are real?

	▲	skybrian 17 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		I mean sure, they could be lying. It seems like a rather elaborate lie, though, considering that they got several other major companies to go along with it.

▲

tokioyoyo 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

If it’s all marketing gimmick, then all companies that have collaborated to patch their bugs are collectively lying. If that’s the case, and they can get both OSS maintainers and the ones are on payrolls of Microsoft et al. to lie… hats off to them honestly, they deserve all the marketing exposure.