| ▲ | I gave every train in New York an instrument(trainjazz.com) |
| 82 points by joshuawolk 2 days ago | 16 comments |
| |
|
| ▲ | hax0ron3 4 minutes ago | parent | next [-] |
| I love jazz but it's kind of funny how much this actually sounds like a really experimental jazz recording. But then, jazz is sometimes spoken of as expressing the rhythms, sounds, and emotions of the modern city. |
|
| ▲ | jannyfer an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Interesting and amazing presentation. I also liked that it didn't explicitly say how it decides when to play a note. All the subway routes are normalized to 15 seconds long from beginning to end. The app then plays all 15 second routes together, playing the instrument assigned to the route when there's a train there. Neat commentary on the instruments that were assigned to the route when you mouse over it. |
|
| ▲ | zephyreon 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Very neat. This is an example of digital art that I’d love to see exist in physical form somehow. I suppose it could get rather noisy at a museum but I love the intersection of mass transit & music. |
|
| ▲ | card_zero an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The trombones (A, C, and E) are kind of farty. This is not how I remember "Take the A train". Too much realism. |
|
| ▲ | cratermoon 11 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| If I could offer one usability suggestion: darken the text displayed at the bottom when a specific route is selected. Currently it's much too light for the white background. I couldn't tell you the exact contrast ratio but I'm certain it doesn't meet accessibility guidelines. |
|
| ▲ | xydac 27 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| classic, crowdsource it to other cities !! |
|
| ▲ | AlBugdy 40 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It's interesting that a lot people like this but dislike AI-generated music. The music itself here is completely random to us, yet I can't see how AI-generated music can be worse than random. The idea is novel/fun/cool, but the notes ARE random as far as we can tell. So if you're against AI music, you just like the idea but don't care about the music or... something else I can't imagine. Enlighten me, please. |
| |
| ▲ | jackp96 a few seconds ago | parent | next [-] | | Why do you think people dislike AI-generated content? It's not because AI-generated music inherently sucks. It's generally C-grade professional music. It's just not novel or especially interesting, and the low barrier to entry means there's a ton of slop in the space. A lot of people have always wanted to make music, never made it past the barrier of "music is hard," and therefore have no clue as to what makes truly good music. And now that they have AI, they think they can just skip all the boring parts and make great songs. And while they can skip a lot of steps in the creative process — those skipped steps also help musicians develop their artistic taste and judgment. And just because these AI "creators" can't tell the difference, they assume others can't either. And then they get mad when critics recognize their uninspired, derivative slop for what it is. That's not limited to music, either. You see it in coding, graphic design, writing, and pretty much any other LLM-assisted content generation. Maybe it'll change one day as models get better. Maybe not. This project is original, stylish, technically clever, aesthetically pleasing, and well-crafted. There's a level of polish and intention behind it, and people here recognize that. | |
| ▲ | pierrec 22 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The music all by itself is not particularly enjoyable here. What's great is the concept, execution, and the way data from an unlikely source is directly audible in the music. What defines art will always be fuzzy, but this particular work is a good example of art I can appreciate: presenting known things in an unusual way, playing with perception to create new connections between remote concepts, and sometimes providing a stepping stone to, as you say, enlightenment. | |
| ▲ | PowerElectronix 25 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I think it has to be with expectations. Out of random music we don't expect much, so any result that is nice is good enough. For AI we are promised it's "just as good" but we get generic, soulless music that bring nothing new to the table. Yeah, it's better than a lot of people, but it doesn't deliver the "just as good" part. On top of that you get that now anyone can promp a song and have a deluge of grey, tasteless elevator music. | |
| ▲ | MattGaiser 20 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | A lot has to do with the story. Nobody would likely listen to this as pure music. | | |
| ▲ | card_zero 16 minutes ago | parent [-] | | What is "pure music"? Who listens to music with no ideas about it? Of course music can be worse than random: it can be annoying. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | huhkerrf an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The sound doesn't work for me, but I love the description of the G. It does have a cult following: and just like a cult you're tricked into loving it despite its many flaws, like the one hour wait at night or sprinting to the middle of the platform. |
| |
| ▲ | bsimpson an hour ago | parent [-] | | The MTA knows the nights you want to take it, and ensures it doesn't go past Bedford-Nostrand on precisely those nights. |
|
|
| ▲ | RohanAdwankar 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| So cool! |
|
| ▲ | ananmays an hour ago | parent | prev [-] |
| lovely |