| ▲ | lunar_rover 3 hours ago | |
> To win, all Linux had to do is stand still, and that's exactly what it did! It is moving? Red Hat has been investing in containised apps and image based distros for years, Valve single handedly made Linux gaming viable. HDR development is mostly driven by Valve and Red Hat customers. And no Linux isn't good enough yet. UX is all over the place. | ||
| ▲ | WhyNotHugo an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |
> And no Linux isn't good enough yet. UX is all over the place. Sure, the UX for Linux desktop is all over the place, and a lot of software is messy and untidy. But Windows isn't any better in that sense. It doesn't have a clear, cohesive design style either. Its selling point used to be that users were familiar with the UI, but it seems to change so much that users can't really leverage that much either. | ||
| ▲ | embedding-shape 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
> And no Linux isn't good enough yet. UX is all over the place. Of course you'd think the UX is messy if you only look at the kernel ;) It's up to the distributions and desktop/window managers to handle the UX, and the experience varies as much as there are desktop/window managers. Some of them are fairly internally consistent, like KDE and Gnome, and at least they're currently more internally consistent than Windows and macOS. I use macOS, Windows and Gnome daily, and the only one that doesn't give me daily grief in some manner, is Gnome. | ||