| ▲ | simmerup 3 hours ago | |||||||
The LLM bought up the disease because some person put a fake journal in its training data. If the person put their product as th definitive cure for the made up disease, the LLM probably would have mentioned that too. > merely assumed the disease was true when the preprint was pointed at it. What do you mean by preprint pointed at it? It being the disease? | ||||||||
| ▲ | simianwords 3 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
> The LLM bought up the disease because some person put a fake journal in its training data. This is not true - the model was not trained on this fake disease. It brought it up because it found it during real time search. >What do you mean by preprint pointed at it? It being the disease? On this I'm wrong - it turned out that the model brought up this disease even when not mentioning it explicitly. | ||||||||
| ||||||||