It's not like the approach they took is any different. Just slapped 8x the number of computers on it for calculating the same thing and wait to see if they disagree. Not the pinnacle of engineering. The equivalent of throwing money at the problem.

▲

curiousObject 13 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

>Just slapped 8x the number of computers on it

‘Just’ is not an appropriate word in this context. Much of the article is about the difficulty of synchronization, recovery from faults, and about the redundant backup and recovery systems

▲

MikeTheGreat an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

What happens when they don't?

▲

vasco an hour ago | parent [-]

If you have a point to make, make it.

	▲	MikeTheGreat 15 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		What my question is hinting at is that there's actually some really interesting engineering around resolving what happens when the systems disagree. Things like Paxos and Raft help make this much more tractable for mere mortals (like myself); the logic and reasoning behind them are cool and interesting.