> I think the number of people opposing the construction would increase when they release its half the county.

What's the math on that?

It's interesting to see the US mandate ethanol production the way they do, which could be argued to be a farm subsidy, and then balk at the land needed for solar installations.

For arguments made in good faith- I think it's humanity's inability to comprehend scale. We can't get the volume of a glass of water right if we change it from tall to wide. Why would we think that terrawatts worth of PV would be a square shorter on a side than most people's daily commute?

It's not a If/Or Question. Agrisolar is even beneficial to farmers