| ▲ | bluegatty 2 hours ago | |||||||
You're offering to deliver parcels by horse - thinking that somehow your 'delivering is better because it's more natural' and that your customers will appreciate it, over the 'smog' that the cars create. Or in other words - 'non existent'. It is arrogant and luddite to suggest that 'using AI is not doing it properly' or that anyone will care. They care that it's done well - that's it. FYI, the code that AI produces is probably better than what you produce - at least a functional level. 'Artisanility' is worthless in 'code' - there are no 'winding staircases' for us to custom build, as a master carpenter would. Where you can continue to 'write code by hand' is for very arcane, things, but even then you're still going to have to use AI for a lot of things in support of that. So if you want to get into compiler design - sure. But still - without mastery of AI, you'll be left behind. At least with horses, there's a naturalist component, with 'code' - nobody cares at all. There's zero interest in it, there's not 'organic' angle to sell. | ||||||||
| ▲ | sassymuffinz an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Maybe in your industry but in mine working with small and medium businesses they value reliability above everything else. They don't give a shit whether you use AI or not as long as it's stable and works and are prepared to pay a premium for someone who knows what they're doing. If you want to have a race to the bottom and be Sam Altman's lap dog, that your business. | ||||||||
| ▲ | eudamoniac 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
I really don't understand why you people always say these things so matter of factly. I'd put a lot of money (and do, in the markets) on you being wrong. I'm pretty sure in ten years I will not have a problem keeping a software job without using AI. | ||||||||
| ||||||||