I read it, so don't talk down to me. The numbers are worse on other platforms that they use. And if it were just about the numbers, the article would just be about that.

▲

dominicq an hour ago | parent | next [-]

I agree with you. It's clear that they're leaving X because "X bad", but they don't want to say it that way. I don't know if X is or isn't bad, but it seems pretty mainstream and a good representation of a lot of society, both US and international, so for an org that apparently cares for the online rights of people, it feels silly to leave a platform where there are - people. (and this is coming from someone who doesn't use X or social media in general)

	▲	basisword 12 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		It is a poor representation of society internationally. Twitter has never been a big platform outside the US (and Japan I believe). It's irrelevant most other places.

▲

PunchyHamster an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

It is just about numbers. Rest is performative bullshit.

Staying on platform to comment on bad things that are happening is far more valuable than "but there are bad people here and musk bad"

	▲	traderj0e 43 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		I'm not gonna make this about good vs bad, just gonna say EFF is telling us they endorse the Democratic party, a bit like the ACLU. If that's the message they want to send, that's fine.