This is still worse than Anthropic's right? Because you get access to their top model even at the $20 price point

Tiberium 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It's not worse, Anthropic simply has no equivalent model (if you don't consider Mythos) of GPT 5.4 Pro. Google does though: Gemini 3.1 Deep Think.

GPT 5.4 Pro is extremely slow but thorough, so it's not meant for the usual agentic work, rather for research or solving hard bugs/math problems when you provide it all the context.

▲

giwook 41 minutes ago | parent [-]

I'm genuinely asking, when you say Gemini 3.1 DT is an equivalent model of GPT 5.4 Pro, is there a specific benchmark/comparison you're referring to or is this more anecdotal?

And do you mean to say that you don't really use GPT 5.4 Pro unless it's for a hard bug? Curious which models you use for system design/architecture/planning vs execution of a plan/design.

TIA! I'm still trying to figure out an optimal system for leveraging all of the LLMs available to us as I've just been throwing 100% of my work at Claude Code in recent months but would like to branch out.

	▲	simianwords 35 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Pro and DT model are equivalents because - internally same architecture of best of N - not available in the code harness like Codex, only in the UI (gpt has API) - GPT-5.4 pro is extremely expensive: $30.00 input vs $180.00 output - both DT and Pro are really good at solving math problems

▲

2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[deleted]