| ▲ | irishcoffee 3 hours ago | |||||||
So, reading the tea leaves, they're either losing subscribers for the $200 plan, or they're not following the same hockey stick path of growth they thought they were... maybe? Edit: I wonder if this is actually compute-bound as the impetus | ||||||||
| ▲ | tedsanders 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Nope, it's just that a lot of people (especially those using Codex) asked us for a medium-sized $100 plan. $20 felt too restrictive and $200 felt like a big jump. Pricing strategy is always a bit of an art, without a perfect optimum for everyone: - pay-per-token makes every query feel stressful - a single plan overcharges light users and annoyingly blocks heavy users - a zillion plans are confusing / annoying to navigate and change This change mostly just adds a medium-sized plan for people doing medium-sized amounts of work. People were asking for this, and we're happy to deliver. (I work at OpenAI.) | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | alyxya 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Plenty of people wanted to spend more than $20 but less than $200 for a plan. It's long overdue IMO. | ||||||||