new | show | ask | jobs Github

nailer 4 days ago

Pakistan (the mediator) doesn't think it included a ceasefire in Lebanon against Hezbollah.

> I can also see the US administration agreeing to something

Can you see the US specifically agreeing to a ceasefire against Hezbollah? That sounds very unlikely.

Why should the US not get involved in terrorist attacks on a bunch of its allies, including attacks on US citizens?

▲

happymellon 3 days ago | parent [-]

> Pakistan (the mediator) doesn't think it included a ceasefire in Lebanon against Hezbollah.

Citation.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/clyeg3224d9t

> The US and Israel have indicated Lebanon does not form part of the agreement, while Pakistan - a key mediator in the talks - has said it does.

Pakistan disagrees with you.

▲

johng 3 days ago | parent [-]

The sad part is that the media has been caught lying and fabricating so much stuff you can't believe what they say anymore. It's hard to know who to trust. Especially the BBC, which has been caught doctoring video (and just downright lying in articles) quite often.

	▲	happymellon 3 days ago \| parent [-]
		Hence why I've asked for a citation. > quite often. Citation on it being "quite often". There was one on a Panorama documentry. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c874nw4g2zzo But to go back to the original point that Pakistan claims it was part of the deal. If you don't like BBC then how about CNN https://edition.cnn.com/2026/04/08/world/video/pakistan-leba... CNBC https://www.cnbc.com/2026/04/08/lebanon-seeks-clarity-on-cea... Times of India https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/middle-east/was-le...