| ▲ | boringg 7 hours ago | |||||||
I mean those class action lawsuits enrich trial lawyers and maybe force companies to behave better (though i bet empirical evidence would show that its more a cost of business). The 20$ dollars people get is nothing but a guise that the trial lawyers are helping people. | ||||||||
| ▲ | singleshot_ 14 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
> I mean those class action lawsuits enrich trial lawyers The entire point, of course, is to encourage such suits by incentivizing those able to bring them. | ||||||||
| ▲ | bilekas 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
I'm not sure if the lower price means that class actions shouldn't still be taken. It's to allow companies to not have to deal with individual claims for each person. I see that the ranges can be substantial though, several thousands, but seems to be criteria. > Nearly nine months later, Mark received a notification that his claim had been approved. Two weeks after that, $186 was deposited into his bank account. While the amount wasn’t substantial, it covered a grocery run and a phone bill—and more importantly, it reminded him that companies can be held accountable, even in small ways. [0] [0] https://peopleforlaw.com/blog/how-much-do-people-typically-g... If the fine's don't dissuade companies from bad practices, the class actions with theoreticaly no upper limit might be a better option to enforce proper behaviour. | ||||||||
| ||||||||