| ▲ | mckirk 2 hours ago | |||||||||||||
Along these lines: I really like the 'Climate Reanalyzer' project by the Climate Change Institute at the University of Maine [1]. There's so much good stuff there if you click around a bit; you can create custom plots for the surface temperature of different regions for example[2], which quickly shows you that Western Europe has actually warmed a lot more than the global average, and we're closer to +2°C already in that region. [1]: https://climatereanalyzer.org/clim/sst_daily/?dm_id=world2 [2]: https://climatereanalyzer.org/research_tools/monthly_tseries... | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Scarblac 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
In general I think the sea warms slower than land, so you'd expect land everywhere to warm faster than the global average. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | engineer_22 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
https://climatereanalyzer.org/research_tools/monthly_tseries... What changed in 1979? | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | paganel an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
> https://climatereanalyzer.org/research_tools/monthly_tseries... It can also be clearly seen that the 2020 limit on the sulphur content in the fuel oil used on board ships [1] had quite the negative effects when it comes to surface sea temperatures, but I haven't that many climate (and not only) scientists taking responsibility of that act (even though related warnings had been made, I remember reading one just before the measure went in effect). [1] https://www.imo.org/en/mediacentre/hottopics/pages/sulphur-2... | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||