| ▲ | John Deere to pay $99M in right-to-repair settlement(thedrive.com) |
| 138 points by CharlesW 4 hours ago | 33 comments |
| |
|
| ▲ | chasil 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| The complete crack of Deere's firmware in 2022 must have had some impact on this. https://www.theregister.com/2022/08/16/john_deere_doom/ Edit: 'Sick Codes confirmed that he believes John Deere failed to comply with its GPL obligations. "I'd love for them to come forward and explain how they are in compliance," he said.' |
| |
| ▲ | bri3d an hour ago | parent [-] | | I wouldn’t really call that a “complete crack” (although it IS cool). There’s an _awful_ lot more firmware in a car or tractor than the display unit, and arguably it’s one of the less important modules in most architectures. Cracked versions of Deere Service Advisor are much more meaningful to the kinds of repairs farmers perform than firmware exploits are. |
|
|
| ▲ | SilverElfin 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Seems like a small price for a big company. Shouldn’t there be some higher punitive fine for even trying this tactic? It’s basically zero cost for companies to be abusive. |
| |
| ▲ | adityamwagh an hour ago | parent [-] | | Yes there should be. But there won’t be until US stops lobbying and American public elects lawmakers that work for people instead of their own pockets. | | |
| ▲ | nalekberov 9 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Unfortunately most people has a price in this world. Those who can’t be bought are just so rare. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | darth_avocado 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The stock is up 5% today. What’s the catch? |
| |
| ▲ | jabwd an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | They settled, and paid pennies for being able to continue the status quo. Given that the headline is journalistic malpractice at best; and you asking this question kinda proves that. > While the agricultural manufacturing giant pointed out in a statement that this is no admission of wrongdoing Welp, gotta sue again in the future, hopefully lobbied laws in place to prevent whatever forced them to settle by then! | |
| ▲ | tartoran 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > What’s the catch? 99m is a drop in the bucket. They were probably expecting more. | |
| ▲ | explodes 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | IANAL but my understanding with settlements is that It removes the possibility of the defendant risking a judgement of wrongdoing and causing more problems down the road, like having to fix their mistakes. | |
| ▲ | bluGill 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The market doesn't care. It is a big deal to some people here, but to the vast majority it doesn't change a thing (or doesn't seem to) and so the markets don't care. | |
| ▲ | jauntywundrkind an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Anticipating 10.01 years from now, when John Deere sends a new over the air update and the situation goes right back to where it was, with no one having access to their equipment. | |
| ▲ | snapetom 34 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | There was a MoU between the American Farm Bureau and John Deere signed in 2023 that outlined right to repair. This consequently already altered Deere's business model with respect to IP and right to repair, and gave signals that a settlement was coming. In other words, the stock price already accounted for the change. Very few things catches stock prices by surprise in the long term. | |
| ▲ | aucisson_masque 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | The market expected a worst outcome ? | | |
| ▲ | maest 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | No, all US equities are up after the Iran ceasefire news. You need to look at Deere stock after taking out the beta to the market. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | causality0 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| One of the most user-hostile companies on earth. My John Deere lawnmower came with a fuel gauge that runs off a CR2032 that's embedded in epoxy. The battery runs out of charge in about six months and the gauge stops working. If you saw the gauge open and replace the battery it doesn't start working again. If you disconnect the gauge the lawnmower won't start. Replacement gauges are $60. |
| |
| ▲ | dyauspitr 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | That’s wild.They had to go out of their way to not wire it to the 12V. | |
| ▲ | dmos62 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Hot take: it takes mental gymnastics to think that planned obsolescence is not fraud. | |
| ▲ | elAhmo 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Don’t buy their stuff then. | | |
| ▲ | snowe2010 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Don’t comment if you don’t want to actually contribute. How are people supposed to know these things before buying the equipment. What if they’re the only provider in their region? There’s a billion reasons why your comment doesn’t contribute. | | |
| ▲ | laughing_man 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | "Don't buy their stuff" is exactly the right answer. You need to do your research before you buy big ticket items. It may not be true in every sector, but Deere has plenty of competition. | | |
| ▲ | alpaca128 8 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Do you seriously expect other companies not following suit? People need lawnmowers, so this can quickly turn into the same situation we have with the inkjet printer market. | |
| ▲ | enaaem an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | How can you do research without victims complaining? |
| |
| ▲ | linuxftw 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | John Deere has had a terrible reputation for over a decade now. They've always used proprietary parts for the tractors. Do 5 minutes of research. | |
| ▲ | edm0nd 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | bruh dont sweat it. mainly everyone here is SF tech bros who have never worked a hard day in their life lol | |
| ▲ | charcircuit an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | >How are people supposed to know these things before buying the equipment. By looking at reviews or paying someone to evaluate the product. >What if they’re the only provider in their region Then there is an opportunity for competition. Or you can import a product from another region. | | |
| ▲ | prawn 28 minutes ago | parent [-] | | All great in theory, but in importing farm machinery, you need to take into account servicing options and warranty claims. Would be painful if you need to truck a harvester or even mower interstate for a warranty claim. And it's not like these things are always available from a source with reviews. Reviews for new models are less likely to cover repair-access issues that will arise in a few years' time. |
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | skeptrune 33 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| this is awesome. beyond happy to see it |
|
| ▲ | verdverm 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The second paragraph likely answers some of your immediate questions > The settlement also includes an agreement by Deere to provide “the digital tools required for the maintenance, diagnosis, and repair” of tractors, combines, and other machinery for 10 years. That part is crucial, as farmers previously resorted to hacking their own equipment’s software just to get it up and running again. John Deere signed a memorandum of understanding in 2023 that partially addressed those concerns, providing third parties with the technology to diagnose and repair, as long as its intellectual property was safeguarded. Monday’s settlement seems to represent a much stronger (and legally binding) step forward. |
| |
|
| ▲ | mothballed 35 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I bought a ~completely mechanical tractor without ECU right under the 25hp cutoff that requires computer and emissions controls to get around this bullshit. The adding of DPF and/or SCR to agricultural diesels gave vendors cover to fuck the customer using the excuse of preventing emissions tampering. |
|
| ▲ | shevy-java an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Good! Wonder if Louis Rossmann already mentioned that. |
|
| ▲ | bearjaws an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Needs another zero, likely made 9 figures in revenue from this scheme. |
|
| ▲ | pnw 18 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Up to one third of that $99m goes to attorneys. Named plaintiffs get $25k each and class members get what's left over, which could be anything from $50 to $5k according to ChatGPT. I wonder if they'll throw in free credit monitoring with that? |
