> I don't mean that thinks that everyone has to share my perspective. It's just my own.

I think you are walking all around the word "consent" and trying very hard to avoid it altogether.

Your perspective, because it refuses to include any sort of consent, is invalid. No perspective that refuses consent can be valid.

▲

steveklabnik 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Consent is absolutely important, but that does not mean that every single thing in the entire world requires explicit consent. You did not ask me for consent to use my words in your comment. That does not mean you're a bad person.

Free use is an important part of intellectual property law. If it did not exist, the powerful could, for example, stifle public criticism by declaring that they do not consent to you using their words or likeness. The ability to do that is important for society. It is also just generally important for creating works inspired by others, which is virtually every work. There has to be lines for cases where requiring attribution is required, and cases where it is not.

▲

lelanthran 2 hours ago | parent [-]

> You did not ask me for consent to use my words in your comment.

I am not representing your words as mine. I am not using your words to profit off. I am not making a gain by attributing your words to you.

> There has to be lines for cases where requiring attribution is required, and cases where it is not.

You are blurring the lines between "using a quote or likeness" and "giving credit to". I am skeptical that you don't know the difference between the two.

Regardless, any "perspective" that disregards the need to acquire consent is invalid. Even if you are going to ignore it, you have to acknowledge that you don't feel you need any consent from the people you are taking from.

This whole "silence is consent" attitude is baffling.

▲

steveklabnik 2 hours ago | parent [-]

You made an incredibly strong statement that is much broader than what we are talking about. I am pointing out various cases where I think that broadness is incorrect, I am not equating the two.

I do not think that, if you read, say, https://steveklabnik.com/writing/when-should-i-use-string-vs... , and then later, a friend asks you "hey, should I use String or &str here?" that you need my consent to go "at the start, just use String" instead of "at the start, just use String, like Steve Klabnik says in https://steveklabnik.com/writing/when-should-i-use-string-vs... ". And if they say "hey that's a great idea, thank you" I don't think you're a bad person if you say "you're welcome" without "you should really be saying welcome to Steve Klabnik."

It is of course nice if you happen to do so, but I think framing it as a consent issue is the wrong way to think about it.

We recognize that this is different than simply publishing the exact contents of the blog post on your blog and calling it yours, because it is! To me, an LLM is a transformative derivative work, not an exact copy. Because my words are not in there, they are not being copied.

But again, I am not telling anyone else that they must agree with me. Simply stating my own relationship with my own creative output.

	▲	lelanthran 28 minutes ago \| parent \| next [-]
		> But again, I am not telling anyone else that they must agree with me. Simply stating my own relationship with my own creative output. Look, I'm not saying that you are doing that, I'm pointing out that "Silence is consent" is not as strong an argument that many think it is.
	▲	sillysaurusx an hour ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Just wanted to compliment you on your classy attitude and style, along with your solid points. It’s not easy to take that side of the debate. Cheers.

▲

altruios an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

refuse consent?

You may need to clarify that thought.

I don't think the poster has a viewpoint that 'refuses consent', their viewpoint is their writing they put for others to view is for others to view, regardless of how it is viewed. They seem to be giving consent, not refusing it, no?

	▲	lelanthran 27 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		> refuse consent? Who said anything about refusing consent?