| ▲ | int32_64 13 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
If you've ever seen Back's twitter you would know he's not Satoshi. I'm still firmly in the Finney camp. Every couple years one of these articles shows up focusing on one of the core Satoshi suspects, at least do a Wei Dai one next time. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Ancapistani 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I’m also in the Finney camp. The most important bit to me is that doing something like this would be entirely in-line with his personality. Also, I think he truly believed there was a good chance he’d eventually be brought back. The most likely case in my mind is that he died with the private keys in his head, and that we’ll never get confirmation. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | mijoharas 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
So I just searched the article for Finney to see why it claimed it wasn't him. It claims Satoshi was active after Finney had died? What's that about? I used to be of the opinion that it was probably hal, but haven't paid too much attention. What's the counter evidence here? And why do we disregard that? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||