Compared to the absolute baffling amount of money spent for military purposes, knowing more about the moon is well worth it.

▲

palata 2 hours ago | parent [-]

No no no no, I can't let that go. Sending astronauts around the moon has nothing to do with "knowing more about the moon". We don't need people up there to observe the moon. In fact, it's a lot easier and better to have sensors go there and automatically make measurements (e.g. pictures).

Now thinking about Mars, sending astronauts there is actually a net negative for science because it risks contaminating Mars.

We send astronauts there because it's cool, period. Science has nothing to do with it.

	▲	1shooner 25 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		This FAQ from the NASA website seemed particularly intellectually dishonest: >Why do we need astronauts to view the Moon when we have robotic observers? Human eyes and brains are highly sensitive to subtle changes in color, texture, and other surface characteristics. Having astronaut eyes observe the lunar surface directly, in combination with the context of all the advances that scientists have made about the Moon over the last several decades, may uncover new discoveries and a more nuanced appreciation for the features on the surface of the Moon. https://www.nasa.gov/missions/nasa-answers-your-most-pressin...