Remix.run Logo
ErroneousBosh 11 hours ago

Jesus, sourceforge is still on the go?

tvbusy 9 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I understand that most people want to move to other more modern tools, it's up to you. However, what baffled me is why the author's choice not to move is a problem? Did we pay them to move and they did not move as promised? Was there some crowd funding to move that was not fulfilled?

IshKebab 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> what baffled me is why the author's choice not to move is a problem?

Because Sourceforge is horrible to use and was at one point actively pushing malware? It's pretty obvious tbh.

ErroneousBosh 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I just didn't think Sourceforge was still running. There was a mass exodus from it about 20 years ago when it became a massive ad farm that started injecting ads into people's tarballs.

It was never as good as freshmeat.net even in its heyday.

SXX 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Might be it even not using all your code to train AI. Or at least not asking your explicit permission to do it.

JimDabell 10 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Not every conversation has to be a conversation about AI.

karel-3d 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

sourceforge was always very scummy, I think they would definitely use the code for that if they could

mbreese 10 hours ago | parent [-]

It wasn’t always scummy… but there was a definite shift after they got bought. It’s kept getting worse since then.

Then again, this was something like 20 years ago. Back then, Sourceforge was something closer to GitHub today. It was the de facto public source repository. You could even get an on-premise version, IIRC.

Actually, this is sounding a lot like GitHub these days… not sure what that means.

ErroneousBosh 2 hours ago | parent [-]

As I've said elsewhere, freshmeat.net was better :-)

mbreese 2 hours ago | parent [-]

For project discovery, definitely -- but not as a source code repository.

Wow, we're dating ourselves on this, but I remember when it was a big deal that SF.net added SVN support. They apparently didn't turn off CVS until 2017!

egorfine 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

And unfortunately some projects exclusively use sourceforge. Which breaks some of my CI pipelines.

kome 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

yeah, it just works