Remix.run Logo
BobbyJo 7 hours ago

[flagged]

WaxProlix 6 hours ago | parent [-]

Weird, from the outside it seems like bombing civilians and infrastructure is more inflammatory and antagonizing than some words/propaganda.

BobbyJo 6 hours ago | parent [-]

[flagged]

donkeybeer 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Let me summarize the argument more cleanly:

Words are violence!!! Hearing death to America hurt me badly!!

vs actual invasions and bombings of your mainland from two hyperviolent countries with a long history of the same

BobbyJo 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Who's argument are you summarizing? Is this about the repeat comment?

donkeybeer 5 hours ago | parent [-]

The persons you were talking to.

BobbyJo 2 hours ago | parent [-]

The were arguing the opposite of what you said if anything. You sure you didn't respond to the wrong comment?

donkeybeer an hour ago | parent [-]

Big scary words are not violence. They can't hurt you. Bombings and invasions that killed people are violence.

BobbyJo an hour ago | parent [-]

I agree, I'm just confused where that fits in this thread.

donkeybeer 42 minutes ago | parent [-]

Actual violence is much more antagonizing than mere hurt feelings.

BobbyJo 11 minutes ago | parent [-]

I wouldn't classify full scale war as "antagonizing," but, if you want to downplay it, be my guest.

tovej 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Ask the same dumb question, get the same answer.

BobbyJo 5 hours ago | parent [-]

[flagged]

tovej 4 hours ago | parent [-]

No. You made the same argument twice and got the same response twice.

BobbyJo 2 hours ago | parent [-]

I didn't make any argument twice. I only responded with an argument once. What did I argue twice?