|
| ▲ | Thlom 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Do you not read the news? Israel was bombing Lebanon DAILY and occupying parts of southern Lebanon throughout the so called ceasefire. All without Hezbollah firing a single shot in retalliation until Israel and the US attacked Iran DURING NEGOTIATIONS! |
|
| ▲ | ra an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| If it wasn't for Israel's dogged expansionism, Hezballah would never have been created, Hamas would never have been created and Palestine would still be a liberal democracy. |
|
| ▲ | riffraff an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > Without attacks from Hezballah and other Iranian backed groups Isreal would not have attacked targets in Lebanon Israel also bombed southern Syria, to "protect the druze community". Syria has not attacked Israel, there are some random terrorist groups who did, but they attacked Israels' occupying forces in Syria. |
|
| ▲ | PowerElectronix 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I think that expelling all shia muslims from the recently conquered territory is a bit more than defending oneself. |
|
| ▲ | RobertoG 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Man, Hezbollah was, literally, created as an answer to Israel attacks. |
|
| ▲ | ImPostingOnHN 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| It's clear that israel is an attacker here, and Iran, Palestine, and Lebanon are defending. Without attacks from israel and other israel backed groups, iran would not have attacked targets in israel. Even the most recent escalation started with israel (and the USA) attacking Iran a few weeks ago, not the other way around. Your take seems to hinge on holding an unfounded bayesian prior that israel is "the good guy" and therefore everything they do must be "defending". The world does not share this unfounded bayesian prior of yours, and thus remains unconvinced of the resulting conclusions drawn by israel and yourself. You will have to do a better job of convincing others, rather than simply asserting your opinions at them. |
| |