| ▲ | annexrichmond 9 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nobody is saying they are acceptable. But it'd be naive to say there's ever zero risk. What's your brilliant plan? Let Iran have nukes? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | cogman10 9 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
> Nobody is saying they are acceptable. Saying "Accidents happen in war" is absolutely a way of saying "Accidents are acceptable in war". That's what's being said here. Otherwise, it's a useless thing to say. > What's your brilliant plan? Let Iran have nukes? There was no evidence that Iran was pursuing nukes. Certainly no evidence that they were `n days` away from getting nukes. My "brilliant" plan would have been the negotiations that were happening where Iran agreed to pretty strict monitoring and stipulations on nuclear fuel development. The "Iran was getting nukes" rhetoric needs real evidence that was actually happening not "we think that might be happening because Trump said so." | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||