| ▲ | ktimespi 8 hours ago | |
This was my concern too. The whole point of using S3 as a file system instead of EBS / EFS (for me at least) is to minimize cost and I don't really see why I would use this instead of s3fs. | ||
| ▲ | avereveard 4 hours ago | parent [-] | |
Probably some tradeoff at high client count or if you seek into files to read partial data | ||