Have you been living under a rock for the last quarter century?

It doesn’t take planes, ships, or missile launchers to defeat the US military. The average American gun owner is better equipped than the insurgents that have defeated our armed forces.

▲

smcnc 10 hours ago | parent [-]

Define defeat here. I think everyone in this thread confuses actual defeat with indifference and political risk. If the US military could be defeated so easily America would cease to exist, no? It just loses interest and moves on. Nobody attacks the US because they would lose.

	▲	hackable_sand 9 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		You can defeat someone without killing them. You can defeat someone without attacking them. You don't even have to be in the same room as someone, nor in the same century, to defeat someone.
	▲	throwup238 9 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		Defeat is failure to achieve strategic goals. (The fact that you’re even asking that question is a strong signal that you have no idea what you’re talking about, and that you think rhetorical questions are a substitute for critical thinking) Anyone who thinks America would cease to exist due to foreign military action is a fool. Canada and Mexico do not have the logistical capabilities and no one else has trans-Pacific/Atlantic force projection.
	▲	blitzar 4 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		> Nobody attacks the US because they would lose. And anytime the US attacks someone it loses.
	▲	8 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		[deleted]