| ▲ | TypesWillSaveUs 2 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||
Describing providing a highly valuable service for money as `rent seeking` is pretty wild. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | bertil an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||
It could be, formally, if they have a monopoly. However, I’m tempted to compare to GitHub: if I join a new company, I will ask to be included to their GitHub account without hesitation. I couldn’t possibly imagine they wouldn’t have one. What makes the cost of that subscription reasonable is not just GitHub’s fear a crowd with pitchforks showing to their office, by also the fact that a possible answer to my non-question might be “Oh, we actually use GitLab.” If Anthropic is as good as they say, it seems fairly doable to use the service to build something comparable: poach a few disgruntled employees, leverage the promise to undercut a many-trillion-dollar company to be a many-billion dollar company to get investors excited. I’m sure the founders of Anthropic will have more money than they could possibly spend in ten lifetimes, but I can’t imagine there wouldn’t be some competition. Maybe this time it’s different, but I can’t see how. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | 1attice 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||
My housing is pretty valuable. I pay rent. Which timeline are you in? | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||